|
See What People Have to Say
Regarding VOSI V50.2
Name: R.A.R.,
D.C.
Date: 01-11-01
Periodical: TEDD KORAN D.C. e-mail letter
Vote: Affirmative1
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2001
Time: 10:04:00 PM
Comments
AS CHIROPRACTOR FOR THE PAST 35 YEARS I HAVE SEEN THE INCREASE
IN REACTIONS (>DEATHS) WITH THE FORCED VACCINATIONS. I WOULD
APPRECIATE ANY OR ALL DOCUMENTED CASES OF AUTISM OR
DISABILITIES CAUSED BY VACCINATIONS OR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.
THANKS FOR THE ORGANIZATION AND THE INVESTIGATIONS AND
REPORTING. RESPECTFULLY ROBERT A. RUSH D.C.
Name: B H
Date: 10th April, 2001
Periodical: I was sent an email about this directly by
yourselves.
Vote: Abstain with Comment1
Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2001
Time: 01:11:39 AM
Comments
I have read this report and have a few comments. If I HAD to
give a vote, I would give an affirmative one, but you have
made it difficult for a simple vote because you have included
two things to vote on combined. Regarding the freedom of
choice, well that is certainly an absolute must - goes without
saying (though not apparently to the politicians!) I also
absolutely agree in principle with what you are trying to do
in relation to protect people against being injected with
poisons, but I'm unsure that the way you are going about the
mercury issue is the right way.
The relative energy going into the removal
of mercury from vaccines, whilst well intentioned, doesn't
seem to be the most logical approach, looking at the big
picture. To put it clearly it is saying that here we have
children being injected with formulations consisting of
.01-.025% each of formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, paint
thinner, coolant, anti-freeze, dye, detergent phenols,
solvent, borax (ant killer), disinfectant, MSG, glycerol,
sulfite & phosphate compounds, polysorbate 80/20, sorbitol,
polyribosylribitol, betapropiolactone, Amphotericin B and
other chemicals, plus hydrolized gelatin, casein, animal organ
tissue and blood (e.g. cow, chick embryo, monkey, sheep, pig,
dog, etc), aborted human fetus cells, mutated (more virulent)
human viruses in high doses (far higher than what is required
for a susceptible person to contract them naturally),
contaminant animal viruses (e.g. SV40, which causes cancer in
humans), bacteria, bacterial endotoxins, antibiotics, yeast
& animal, bacterial and viral DNA (which when injected can
be incorporated into the recipient DNA), and calling for just
one of these poisons, mercury, to be removed and replaced with
another poison instead. ???
Mercury is in there precisely because they
need a poison to do what they want (act as a preservative), so
when they remove it, they simply substitute it with
#6-pheno-oxyethanol, a protoplasmic poison. Big deal. What has
been achieved? Poisons are poisons, and all the vaccines
contain nothing BUT poisons (including the organic material,
when injected). To me the effort should go into educating the
public about ALL the poisons in vaccines, and conveying the
fact that it is VERY well documented in medical research that
the effect of vaccines is that they SENSITISE (or sensitize,
to spell it the American way). They even use this word in
articles about vaccination. "Sensitisation" means
you are being made MORE susceptible to the infection instead
of the other way around (which would be "immunisation").
I would be only too willing to help the communication of that,
because with all the data available, published in the most
reputable medical journals, it is really quite easy to show
that this is true. Even my Mosby's (main stream) medical
dictionary admits that this is the effect of vaccines. So it
is very easy to show that there is no reason to have vaccines
at all, rather than just replace one poison with another
poison. If it did result in less autism, and we don't know it
would, it would only most likely result in more of another
type of damage.
Another comment I have on the content of the
report is that the conclusion that the "rubella vaccine
is required based on its effectiveness in preventing
rubella" is not a valid conclusion based on either the
available data or the underlying assumption that it is
desirable to prevent rubella. Rubella is a very mild disease.
It so often goes unnoticed that the diagnosis of rubella is
very unreliable. This makes the diagnosis particularly
vulnerable to a general problem in diagnosis of diseases
"against" which vaccines are being used. This
problem is that doctors are taught that the vaccine works, and
it is even on diagnostic guidelines provided to them that
previous vaccination, falsely assumed to be effective, is an
indicator that the infection is not likely to be what it may
look like. In addition to that, vaccines have a derailing
effect on the immune system and its ability to defend itself
against infections. The result is that symptoms (the outward
signs of these defences) are often altered or suppressed in
those vaccinated. This further reduces the likelihood of an
infection being correctly diagnosed, because diagnosis is
based on the observation of symptoms. It is also important to
be aware that if not too badly managed, rubella, as well as
the other "childhood diseases", namely measles,
mumps, chickenpox and whooping cough, are actually beneficial
for the child’s development. They prime and mature the
immune system. Research published in the journal Cancer in
1966 found that getting mumps lowers the risk of ovarian
cancer later in life. An article in the Lancet in 1985 found
getting the proper rash with measles lowers the risk later in
life of sebacious skin diseases, diseases of bone and
cartilage and certain tumours. There have been several similar
findings with these various infections. So it is not even
desirable to prevent rubella anyway.
Lastly, I am quite puzzled at the inclusion
of Down's Syndrome in the report, in the way that it is done.
Down's Syndrome is well known to be a genetic disorder. It is
there from birth. So if you want to establish whether vaccines
are a causal factor in Down's Syndrome you need to look at
vaccines that were given to previous generations. It is
meaningless to look at vaccines that the child is given after
he/she already has Down's Syndrome. A physician from Germany,
Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, is recognised as an expert on
vaccination by the Committee. He wrote a book titled
"Vaccination: Business Based on Fear", in which he
writes: "….In 1866, an English physician described a
very strange illness. Children looked like Mongols. His name
was Down. That’s why we call it Down’s Syndrome today... I
should add that this syndrome is a result of the vaccinations
carried throughout England by Jenner in 1796... It (Down’s
Syndrome) is probably the first congenital disease caused by
vaccinations. In Germany, the first child with evidence of
Down’s Syndrome was reported in 1922. Today, one in every
700 newborns has it." I would appreciate a reply that at
least shows that my comment has been read and noted.
Name: S G
Date: 10 April 2001
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative1
Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2001
Time: 04:10:55 PM
Comments
My son, now 16, has profound developmental problems, which may
be due in part to Thimerosal in his childhood vaccinations
and/or to the Pertusis toxin in DTP ( http://kidsbright.org/
). Consequently, I am determined that his much younger sister
will not be subjected to any vaccinations that are at all
suspect. I deplore the intent of pro-vaccination forces to
push for universal vaccination, especially on the aggressive
schedule now recommended for children; and even more so I
object to the attempt to shout down critics with propaganda
campaigns based on intimidation rather than science.
Name: R C
Date: April 30, 2001
Periodical: e-mail
Vote: Affirmative1
Date: Monday, April 30, 2001
Time: 02:42:07 PM
Comments
I was under the impression that the 'freedom of choice' was
already ours. If that is the case, we want them to 'maintain'
it, not 'provide it'.
Name: S M
Date: 10/01/00
Periodical: emailed to me
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
Just to make sure, since the wording above isn't in a yes or
no format that you know I want mercury out of vaccinations and
choice in whether or not to vaccinate.
Name: M H
Date: Oct 1, 2000
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
My son is mercury poisoned from the vaccinations.
Name: J B
Date: 10/1/00
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
Mercury should absolutely be removed from all vaccines! Some
vaccines, such as for hepatitis b which the vast majority of
children are at low risk, should not be given to children
until a safer vaccine is available for all. Mercury is a
neurtoxin, I can not comprehend how anyone would WANT it to be
injected into infants and children! Furthermore, there is
absolutely no safety research on Thimerosal conducted on
humans! Yes, people should have absolute freedom of choice
when it comes it vaccination. It is the only non-emergency
medical intervention that is mandated and for which we have no
real choice in most situations. Vaccination is a massive
experiment in which everyone acknowledges that some children
will be injured and KILLED by their participation. There is
also no scientific proof that vaccines are effective and there
is absolutely no long-term safety research conducted on
individual vaccines and or on the interaction of the huge
number of doses children now receive.
Name: P W
Date: 10/1/00
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
My son is "Vaccine Injured"
Name: J R
Date: 10/01/00
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
My daughter is autistic due to the mercury in vaccines she
received. To put a toxic metal in a vaccine that is injected
directly into children is insane!!!!! Removing mercury from
vaccines is something that needs to be done immediately,
before one more child has to live the nightmare that my
daughter has had to live.
Name: K S
Date: 10.01.00
Periodical: On-line message board
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
Even the nurses in my local hospital want the right to tell
parents what they know with regard to these vaccines. But
instead they must put the form in front of the parent
educating them about nothing. accept of course the consent
form and it's disclaimers.
Name: G P
Date: 2-10-2000
Periodical: AVN newsgroup
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
If vaccines were so good they would sell themselves. Thimerosal, as we say in Australia, is not the only concern.
Name: L B
Date: 10/02/00
Periodical: Autism Recovery Network email
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
I agree that mercury is toxic & should be removed from all
vaccines, and that parents should be able to choose whether to
give all immunizations to their children based on their
previous medical history
Name: L P
Date: 10/02/00
Periodical: found on Autism list
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
After having two autistic children and looking at the common
denominators, it is grossly apparent that vaccines played a
part in the development of autism.
Name: A C
Date: 10/02/00
Periodical: on line
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
Many other parents and I would like the right to choose NOT to
inject toxic poisons into our infants.
Name: E R
Date: 10/2/00
Periodical: recovered kids
Vote: Abstain with Comment1
Comments
I support removing the mercury. I am concerned about giving
people a choice about whether to vaccinate because this may
have some serious consequences for the entire population.
Perhaps, single dose vaccines can be explored further to
determine if that minimizes the negative reactions.
Name: J S
Date: 10/2/00
Periodical: ARN egroup
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
Some vaccines started out as good things. But like everything,
they need to be re-assessed often to see if are still
effective. Also, vaccines should not be altered "live
version vs. killed", etc., without studying 1st and
educating the community of the change. Parents should have the
accurate materials to review and make a CHOICE whether to have
their children vaccinated instead of being pressured by Dr.'s
and made to feel like you are a negligent parent if you
"put your child at risk by not having vaccinations".
A Country and medical community that "lines our children
up like herds of cattle" just to have vaccinations just
because it's been done that way for so long without
re-reviewing effectiveness (and ironically sometimes finding
out that the vaccine might actually be worse than the illness)
should be considered the "negligent" ones.
Name: J S
Date: 10/2/00
Periodical: ARN egroup
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
Some vaccines started out as good things. But like everything,
they need to be re-assessed often to see if are still
effective. Also, vaccines should not be altered "live
version vs. killed", etc., without studying 1st and
educating the community of the change. Parents should have the
accurate materials to review and make a CHOICE whether to have
their children vaccinated instead of being pressured by Dr.'s
and made to feel like you are a negligent parent if you
"put your child at risk by not having vaccinations".
A Country and medical community that "lines our children
up like herds of cattle" just to have vaccinations just
because it's been done that way for so long without
re-reviewing effectiveness (and ironically sometimes finding
out that the vaccine might actually be worse than the illness)
should be considered the "negligent" ones.
Name: M P
Date: 11/01/00
Periodical: GF/CF List
Vote: Abstain1
Comments
I'm a parent of a child who was developing normally until 12
months of age. To make a long story short my daughter who is
now 4 is struggling in a world of Autism which was directly
caused by vaccines and the mercury that poisoned her. I'm
slowly getting her back as she is now on a detox program. My
anger will never subside because of the lack of research from
the CDC and The FDA many children have suffered. Take the
blame and fix the problem. Someone should do some jail time
for the injuries done to all these kids, PURE NEGLECT and our
Gov. should be ashamed. Is money more important that innocent
children's quality of life??????????
Name: B P F
Date: October 2,2000
Periodical: truegrit
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
I wholeheartedly believe in medical freedom of choice and that
toxins be taken out of vaccines. It is my understanding,
however, that schools do not mandate vaccinations, they are
only following a legislative mandate imposed upon them. In
addition, there are State Immunization Action Plans, and for
example in New York, there are "interventions" by
the Local Health Unit with schools whose school surveys show
immunization rates below 90%. Federal funds are being used for
this project and it also includes going to doctors' offices,
PTA's, etc. Thus, the need for lobbying Congress and State
lawmakers.
Name: t s
Date: 10-2-00
Periodical: on the net
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
after having a reaction to a vaccination our child was in
limbo...although he seems much better today.... we are at a
loss as to how to proceed...the doctors..have given us the ok
to stop vaccinations for the time being...we would like that
option to continue with confidence..thanks for your efforts.
Name: R Z
Date: 10/3/2000
Periodical: VOSI info gained from Raymond Gallop
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
Thank you for helping to raise awareness of the unsafe &
ineffective aspects of vaccines & conducting this ballot.
Best wishes in endeavors. In appreciation, Ros (mother of
Jacob, 6 yrs - started regressing in development following
adverse reactions to vaccines - diagnosed with an Autism
Spectrum Disorder & numerous other problems. Also mother
to Corinne, 10 yrs - has had grommits placed in both ears
after suffering ear infections following measles vaccination
program.
Name: S K, RN
Date: 10/2/00
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
I believe that might heavy metals toxicity following multiple
vaxes in a 9 month period which manifested as autoimmunity and
sensory nerve damage is LARGELY a result of Thimersol, but
since I have been found to be allergic to aluminum and
formaldehyde in addition to mercury, I believe all the nasty
components have a negative synergistic effect. I'd have a
difficult time supporting ANY vaccine currently on the market.
Name: M M. F
Date: 10/3/00
Periodical: Internet
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
I think it's terrible that we would poison our children with
heavy metals not just in these childhood shots but also in the
so called "silver fillings" which are 50% mercury.
Who is the Wizard who came up with the formula for destroying
America from with in?
Name: M and D R
Date: 10/4/2000
Periodical: through internet mail
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
We believe our child became autistic from being double dosed
with MMR vaccination and through much research find the
evidence strong enough to support the removal of thermisol
from vaccines. - I wish the NZ government would take on board
this issue - I have several friends that this has also
happened to.
Name: N E
Date: 10/3/00
Periodical: not sure I understand
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
I believe we have the right to keep our freedom of choice, so
far this seems to be the only thing that a person can truly
keep without interference from any outside source and even now
it is a shame we are having to fight to keep it!
Name: A T
Date: October 2 , 2000
Periodical: I am member of NJAICV
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
First of all, Mercury is a dangerous poison that does not
belong in our children's bodies. I also believe parents should
have the right to choose whether or not their child is
vaccinated. It should, of course, be an extremely researched
decision. Thank you.
Name: E R
Date: 10-3-00
Periodical: on internet
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
Thank you, thank you for an affirmation that numerous
vaccines, in particular those containing Thimerosal are
unsafe! I am printing this article and taking it to my son's
pediatrician who tries to tell me how safe they are and that I
am harming my son by not vaccinating. Thanks!
Name: L W
Date: Oct 4, 2000
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
I have a daughter (had) a daughter that I feel was affected by
vaccinations. She became had gastrointestinal difficulties
after her MMR and DPT. She became autistic, gluten and case in
intolerant. She had her 1st seizure Dec. 3, 1995
and dies 3 days later. Her cause of death was encephalitis,
due to cerebral swelling .I lost my daughter twice, once to
autism and finally to death at the age of 3. No one should
have to go thru this pain. MAKE SURE YOU CAUSE NO HARM - is
not that the physician's oath?
Name: C C
Date: October 4, 2000
Periodical: internet
Vote: Affirmative with Comment1
Comments
Yes, I believe that Thimerosal should be eliminated from
vaccines. Also formaldehyde and other potentially harmful
products in vaccines should be removed. There are now too many
viruses and chemicals in the form of adjuvants put in small
infants system. The practice of multiple vaccines being
administered at one visit should stop. There should be an
attitude of caution regarding the administering of any vaccine
into an infant. I believe that once Thimerosal is removed from
vaccines, there should be a watch on any preservative
replacement to insure that it is not neurotoxic or life
threatening.
Name: M D
Date: 10/8/00
Periodical: through the internet (ray gallup)
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
Thank you for asking these questions. It seems to me that any
country purporting to be a democracy must allow freedom of
choice for ALL health issues and must ensure that all health
matters are proven via independent testing.
Name: A W
Date: 10/7/2000
Periodical: gfcf chat room
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
My child was damaged from the HepB shot given just hours after
his birth. I am a diabetic and therefore he should have never
been vaccinated that early with immune disorder
predisposition! Why is an infant vaccinated against something
you can only get through drug use or sexual intercourse in the
first place? I hope someone finally listens! Vaccines cause
autism!
Name: L B
Date: Oct 8, 2000
Periodical:
Vote: Affirmative1
Comments
My son was made autistic from the vaccines. They tore the hell
out of my son's gut and he now is highly reactive to gluten
and casein. We have spent thousands of dollars and unbalanced
our family life to chase this vaccine-induced condition away.
Updated:
6/11/2001
|