Pogo News 12/8/2005
"9/11 An Explosive Issue or an Issue of Explosives...You Decide"
2005-12-08: "9/11 An Explosive Issue or an Issue of Explosives...You Decide"
This from the Deseret Morning News, Thursday, November 10, 2005.
Although professor Steven E. Jones "Will not go there". in speculating who planted the explosives Pogo will, a relative of Georgie Boy's was in charge of security at the twin towers! (see http://www.voicesofsafety.com/pogonews/2004/pogo-news-2004-05-26.htm).
This is proof that 9/11 was "Made in the U.S.A." in order to justify the invasion of Iraq and to create the "War on Terror" to allow the neocons to destroy this once great nation.
The federal government's support of outsourcing jobs and allowing uncontrolled admission of foreign nationals into this country should be sufficient reasons to overthrow the entire federal government and substitute a new system based on Humanistic capitalism.
America is a DEMOCKERY! See www.voicesofsafety.com ...."About VOSI".
The typical arrogant, stupid, greedy indifferent American citizen is the real reason why this nation is collapsing.
Citizens must start attending their local government meetings and take part in their government in order that the current state and federal governments get the message that "
Every historical revolution has occurred when the citizens would not accept any more tyranny on the part of their leaders. America is at this same point in our own history.
professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC
physics of 9/11 — including how fast and symmetrically one of the
World Trade Center buildings fell — prove that official explanations
of the collapses are wrong, says a Brigham Young University physics
fact, it's likely that there were "pre-positioned
explosives" in all three buildings at ground zero, says Steven E.
a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed
publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous
skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net,
whose research Jones quotes. Jones' article can be found at www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.
who conducts research in fusion and solar energy at BYU, is calling
for an independent, international scientific investigation
"guided not by politicized notions and constraints but rather by
observations and calculations.
is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three
buildings and set off after the two plane crashes — which were
actually a diversion tactic," he writes. "Muslims are
(probably) not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after
all," Jones writes.
for speculation about who might have planted the explosives, Jones
said, "I don't usually go there. There's no point in doing that
until we do the scientific investigation."
investigations, including those of FEMA, the 9/11 Commission and NIST
(the National Institutes of Standards and Technology), ignore the
physics and chemistry of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001, to the Twin
Towers and the 47-story building known as WTC 7, he says. The official
explanation — that fires caused structural damage that caused the
buildings to collapse — can't be backed up by either testing or
history, he says.
acknowledges that there have been "junk science" conspiracy
theories about what happened on 9/11, but "the explosive
demolition hypothesis better satisfies tests of repeatability and
parsimony and therefore is not 'junk science.' "
a 9,000-word article that Jones says will be published in the book
"The Hidden History of 9/11," by Elsevier, Jones offers
The three buildings collapsed nearly symmetrically, falling down into
their footprints, a phenomenon associated with "controlled
demolition" — and even then it's very difficult, he says.
"Why would terrorists undertake straight-down collapses of WTC-7
and the Towers when 'toppling over' falls would require much less work
and would do much more damage in downtown Manhattan?" Jones asks.
"And where would they obtain the necessary skills and access to
the buildings for a symmetrical implosion anyway? The 'symmetry data'
emphasized here, along with other data, provide strong evidence for an
No steel-frame building, before or after the WTC buildings, has ever
collapsed due to fire. But explosives can effectively sever steel
columns, he says.
WTC 7, which was not hit by hijacked planes, collapsed in 6.6 seconds,
just .6 of a second longer than it would take an object dropped from
the roof to hit the ground. "Where is the delay that must be
expected due to conservation of momentum, one of the foundational laws
of physics?" he asks. "That is, as upper-falling floors
strike lower floors — and intact steel support columns — the fall
must be significantly impeded by the impacted mass. . . . How do the
upper floors fall so quickly, then, and still conserve momentum in the
collapsing buildings?" The paradox, he says, "is easily
resolved by the explosive demolition hypothesis, whereby explosives
quickly removed lower-floor material, including steel support columns,
and allow near free-fall-speed collapses." These observations
were not analyzed by FEMA, NIST nor the 9/11 Commission, he says.
With non-explosive-caused collapse there would typically be a piling
up of shattering concrete. But most of the material in the towers was
converted to flour-like powder while
the buildings were falling, he says. "How can we understand this
strange behavior, without explosives? Remarkable, amazing — and
demanding scrutiny since the
Horizontal puffs of smoke, known as squibs, were observed proceeding
up the side the building, a phenomenon common when pre-positioned
explosives are used to demolish buildings, he says.
Steel supports were "partly evaporated," but it would
require temperatures near 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate steel
— and neither office materials nor diesel fuel can generate
temperatures that hot. Fires caused by jet fuel from the hijacked
planes lasted at most a few minutes, and office material fires would
burn out within about 20 minutes in any given location, he says.
Molten metal found in the debris of the
Multiple loud explosions in rapid sequence were reported by numerous
observers in and near the towers, and these explosions occurred far
below the region where the planes struck, he says.
says he became interested in the physics of the WTC collapse after
attending a talk last spring given by a woman who had had a near-death
experience. The woman mentioned in passing that "if you think the
several months of study, he presented his findings at a talk at BYU in
says he would like the government to release 6,899 photographs and
6,977 segments of video footage for "independent scrutiny."
He would also like to analyze a small sample of the molten metal found
at Ground Zero.