|
VOSI
V41-22
UNIVERSAL SPECIFICATION / TEST METHOD
FOR
SLIP RESISTANT (*) FOOTWEAR, IN THE FIELD & LABORATORY
AS MEASURED BY A DRAG TYPE FRICTION TESTER
1.
SCOPE
1.1 This Specification / Test method covers the static (and
dynamic) coefficient of friction (SCOF) requirements for footwear
materials in order to be called "slip-resistant footwear"
under both dry and wet (water) conditions. This specification / test
method is based on approval by a majority of users who require uniform
definitions of "Pedestrian Slip resistance" "Slip
Resistant Walkways" and "Slip Resistant Footwear" (See
3. and NOTE 1).
(*) Specify specific footwear material in "Standard" (V41.23Y) which reference this test method (i.e. dance
shoes, bowling shoes, etc.).
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
standard. English units are shown in parenthesis.
2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
2.1 Federal Specification KK-165C Leather, Cattlehide, Vegetable
Tanned and Chrome Retanned, Impregnated and Soles (Type 1 Factory
(shoemaking) Class 6 Strips). (Appendix Ref. 2)
2.2 OSHA-"Walking and Working Surfaces Compliance
Guidelines", Federal Register 4/10/90, 29CFR Part 1910, Appendix
A to subpart D.
2.3 BOCA National Building code/1990, Commentary Booklet on Sect.
803.5 / "Floor Surfaces"
2.4 Ceramic Tile Institute Field Report CTI82-1-1 (R85)
"Coefficient of Friction between Footwear and Ceramic Tile",
(Appendix Ref. 13) (dry) and ISO TC/189 (wet)
2.5 ASTM D2047, "Standard Test Method for Polish Coated
Flooring as Measured by the James Machine".
2.6 ASTM D4101, "Standard Specification for Polypropylene
Plastic Injection and Extrusion Materials".
2.7 ASTM C1028, "Standard Test Method for Evaluating the SCOF
of Ceramic Tile and Other Like Surfaces by the Horizontal Dynamometer
Pull Meter Method".(Appendix Ref. 16)
2.8 VOSI V.41.21 "Universal Specification / Test Method For
Slip Resistant (*) Walkways, in the Field & Laboratory, As
Measured By a Drag Type Friction Tester"
2.9 VOSI V41.24 "Standard for Standards
Terminology".
2.10 VOSI V41.23Y "Standard for Slip Resistant Footwear,
etc."
2.11 VOSI V41.23Z "Standard for Forensic Engineers who
Investigate Slip and Fall Accidents".
3. TERMINOLOGY
3.1 Definitions
3.1.1 Friction - The resisting force that arises when a
surface of one substance slides, or tends to slide, over an
adjoining surface of itself or another substance.
3.1.2 Static Coefficient of Friction (SCOF) - The ratio of
the horizontal component of force (parallel to the walkway surface,
passing through the tester center of gravity and aligned with the
tester's major axis) required to overcome the resistance to begin
movement to the normal component of the vertical force (weight) of
the object. Sensor contact time is 3 seconds maximum. See 5.7.5 for
Kinetic Coefficient of Friction (KCOF) measurement.
3.1.3 Kinetic (Dynamic) coefficient of friction (KCOF) - The
COF under conditions of macroscopic relative motion between two
bodies. (Ref 2.9)
3.1.4 Pedestrian Slip Resistance (Appendix Ref. 12) - The
properties of a walkway surface that significantly reduces the
probability of a person slipping thereon when wearing Slip Resistant
footwear. (See. "Slip Resistant Walkway" & "Slip
Resistant Footwear").
3.1.5 Slip Resistant Walkway (Appendix Ref. 12) (Primary
Criteria) - A walkway surface wherein the SCOF between standardized
leather and a clean, dry, level surface is 0.50 minimum when using a
sensor pressure similar to walking sole pressure [(69 - 173 KPa (l0
- 25 PSI)]. (Ref: 2.8)
3.1.6 Slip Resistant Walkway (Outdoors or Indoors with
Walkways Normally Subjected to Water Contamination) - A walkway
surface wherein the SCOF between Standardized Monarch EVA and a
level, dry or wet (water) surface is 0.50 and 0.35 minimum
respectively, when using a sensor pressure similar to walking sole
pressure [(69 - 173 KPa (l0-25 PSI)]. (Ref. 2.4). The wet kinetic
(Dynamic) coefficient of friction (KCOF) shall be 0.30 minimum at 5
cm/sec (2"/sec) (Appendix Ref. 14,15), (Ref: 2.7) Dry SCOF /
Wet SCOF = 1.50 max.
3.1.7 Slip Resistant Footwear12 (Primary Criteria)- Any
smooth shoe sole and heel material having a 0.35 minimum dry SCOF
against the "Primary Standard Polypropylene (leather) Test
Panel" (Definition of "Standard Leather") when using
a sensor pressure similar to walking sole pressure [(69 - 173 Kpa
(l0 - 25 PSI)]. Smooth running sports footwear and work boot
materials should have a 0.60 minimum SCOF when tested as previously
stated (Appendix Ref. 12). See NOTE 3.
3.1.8 Slip Resistant Footwear (Footwear normally subjected to
water contamination). Any smooth shoe sole or heel material having a
minimum SCOF of 0.50 dry and 0.35 wet on the "Primary Standard
Florida Ceramic Tile"(Appendix Ref. 16) (Definition of
"Standard Rubber") (Appendix Ref. 17) when using a sensor
pressure similar to walking sole pressure. The wet kinetic (dynamic)
coefficient of friction (KCOF or DCOF) shall be 0.30 minimum at
5cm/sec (2"/sec) see NOTE 3. (ref: 2.8) Dry SCOF / Wet
SCOF = 2.0 max.
NOTE 1 - These definitions were approved by a majority of the
respondents to an international survey of " Proposed Uniform
Definitions" by the Slip Resistance Coordinating Committee of the
National Association of Safety and Health Professionals (NASHP). Testing
in accordance with this specification/test method correlates with slip
and fall accident rate. (Appendix Ref. 12)
3.2 Test Method Terms
3.2.1. "Standardized Leather" - Leather which has been
tested against the "Primary Standard Polypropylene Test
Panel" per paragraph 5.5. The average SCOF obtained has been
shown to maintain its original 0.35 value over time.
3.2.2. "Secondary Standard Polypropylene Test
Panel"(Appendix Ref. 8) - A test panel which is marked with a
"Standard SCOF", based on simultaneously testing with the
"Primary Standard Polypropylene Test Panel," and used when
standardizing the leather sensor prior to SCOF testing (see 5.3.3.5
and 5.5.3, used only for dry testing).
3.2.3. "Secondary Standard Florida Ceramic Tile" - Used
for dry and wet testing. A test panel which is marked with a
"Standard dry and wet SCOF" based on simultaneously
testing of Monarch EVA with the "Primary Standard Florida
Ceramic Tile".
3.2.4. Sensor - The "Standardized Leather",
"Standard Monarch EVA" or smooth footwear material affixed
to the bottom of the tester that contacts the walkway surface when
measuring SCOF.
3.2.5 Footwear - Shoes, rubbers, or boots used under both dry and
wet (water) conditions.
3.2.6 Footwear (Leather / Rubber) Traction Index - The ratio of
the SCOF of leather type materials to the standard SCOF of leather
on the standard polypropylene test surface. The ratio of the SCOF of
rubber materials, dry and wet, to the standard SCOF of Monarch EVA
marked on the Florida Ceramic Tile Secondary Standard.
4. REQUIREMENTS
4.1 In order to be termed "Slip-Resistant Footwear" per
the dry primary criteria, (ref 3.1.6) footwear materials tested per
par. 5 must conform to the SCOF requirements specified herein. Average
SCOF values obtained may be compared directly to the generally
recognized limiting value of > or = to the standard SCOF marked on
the Secondary Standard Polypropylene Leather Test Panel. (0.35 dry on
the primary standard polypropylene leather test surface).
4.2 Dry and wet (water) testing, (ref 3.1.8) using smooth footwear
materials, requires a minimum SCOF of 0.50 dry and 0.35 wet (water) on
the primary Standard Florida Tile. If tested the minimum wet dynamic
COF (KCOF or DCOF) shall be 0.30 minimum at 5 cm/sec (2 "/sec).
4.3 Heel top pieces must have a hardness less than 93 Shore A
(IRHD) to be classified as "slip resistant"(Appendix Ref.
15).
4.4 Due to the relative humidity and temperature dependence of the
dry SCOF of footwear materials, and since these parameters are not
controlled in the test method within this specification (many tests
are performed on site or in situ), the humidity and temperature
at which slip resistance is determined must also be reported.
5. TEST METHOD
5.1 Scope
5.1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the static
coefficient of friction (SCOF) of clean, level dry and wet footwear
materials in the field and laboratory by a horizontal pull (drag
type) slip tester. This test method is not suitable for surfaces
with contaminants other than water.
5.1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety problems, if any associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate
safety practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
NOTE 2 - There is no similar or equivalent ISO or CEN standard.
This Specification / Test Method is being proposed to the walkway and
footwear materials committees of ISO (International Standards
Organization) and ANSI Z41. Standard V41.23Y references
conflicting ASTM test methods for measuring the SCOF of footwear
materials.
5.2 Significance and Use
5.2.1 This test method may be used for measuring SCOF between
walkway surfaces and user contact materials such as shoe sole and
heel material. The measurements made by this type of apparatus are
related to the slip resistance of clean dry surfaces to standardized
leather and wet surfaces to Monarch EVA type (rubber) shoe
materials.
5.2.2 The test results using this test method for SCOF are
comparable to this type of equipment only.
5.2.3 BOCA recommends a 0.50 minimum SCOF between leather and the
walkway surface. An OSHA proposed guideline states that 0.50 minimum
SCOF is recommended as a guide to achieve proper slip resistance.
This is the same value as the ASTM D2047 definition of a "slip
resistant" polish; which is the same approximate SCOF required
by a fast walking young male (Appendix Ref. 12). Official
publications (building codes, consensus standards, ASTM Standard
Practice Guidelines, government publications etc.) should reference
VOSI V 41.21 and V 41.22 for slip resistant walkway and footwear
requirements.
5.3 Apparatus
5.3.1 This test method covers a variety of apparatus designed for
the purpose of measuring the SCOF by the horizontal pull slip
tester. A typical apparatus consists of a) a force gauge or load
cell/sled assembly b) a standard calibration weight c) three
mounting locations for attaching "sensor" material (See
5.3.2) and d) a means to pull the apparatus across the surface being
tested. The horizontal force may be applied manually, by attaching
the hook on the force gage to the hook on the sled, and pulling
(Figure 1) (Appendix Ref.3). A power actuated device uses a tension
cord to "reel" in the sled across the surface being tested
(Appendix Ref. 4). The vertical loads shall result in a contact
pressure of not less than 69 KPa (l0 PSI) and not more than l73 KPa
(25-PSI).
5.3.1.1 The standard calibration weight has a mass equal to one
half the weight of the sled assembly (2.2 +/- 0.00454 Kg (5.0 + /
- 0.01 lb.) for the Technical Products tester (Appendix Ref. 3)
5.3.2 Sensor Material5 The sensor material shall be smooth
footwear heel and sole materials. Cut the sensors to the size
required by the specific apparatus.
NOTE 3 - Where leather type materials are used as footwear
material, dry testing should be done to establish the relationship
between those materials and the readings obtained using
"standardized leather" pads. All smooth heel and sole
materials should have a SCOF > or = "standardized
leather"(Ref. 3.1.7). Were rubber materials are used dry and wet
testing should be done to establish the relationship between these
materials and the readings obtained using standardized Monarch EVA
against the Florida Ceramic Tile (Ref 3.1.8). The maximum hardness of
heel (top piece) materials is 93 Shore A (IRHD) or 45 Shore D (Appendix
Ref.15). Tests on patterned solings, made in the walking direction, must
meet paragraph 3.1.6 and 3.1.7 requirements when using a ten-pound
weight alternately on the heel and sole.
5.3.3 Secondary Standard Polypropylene Test Panel
5.3.3.1 Aluminum backing square, 5052H32 alloy, 2.4mm (3/32
in.) thick and 203 mm (8 in.) square. (Available from most
aluminum companies.)
5.3.3.2 Polypropylene pane (Appendix Ref. l6) 0.79 mm (l/32
in.) thick cut to fit aluminum square. Material per ASTM
D4101-PP011X Extruded Polypropylene ; Shore D hardness 60-70.
Mount polypropylene with the reflective side outward.
5.3.3.3 Polypropylene Adhesive (Appendix Ref. 7).
5.3.3.4 Secondary Standard Test Panel Assembly
5.3.3.4.1 Assemble polypropylene panel by applying adhesive
to both the non-reflective polypropylene and aluminum surfaces
and cementing polypropylene panel to aluminum.
5.3.3.5 Commercial polypropylene test pane (Appendix Ref. l8) -
Secondary standard polypropylene test panels, equivalent to the
primary standard, are standardized against a primary SCOF standard
of 0.35 ("standardized leather" against a primary
standard polypropylene test panel) when purchased from the
manufacturer. Self prepared test panels sent to the manufacturer
for standardization will be marked with the SCOF obtained using
standardized leather ( see par. 5.5.3 regarding leather correction
factor). The SCOF marked on the back of the secondary standard
panel shall be 0.35 +/- 0.l0.
5.3.4 Secondary Standard Florida Ceramic Tile (Appendix
Ref. 16, 8).
Dry and wet
SCOF marked on panel is for Standard Monarch EVA only
NOTE 4 - Primary standard polypropylene is the same as 5.3.3.2.
5.4 Test Surfaces
5.4.1 Test surfaces shall be the Secondary Standard polypropylene
leather test panel8 and Secondary Standard Florida Ceramic Tile16.
The area adjacent to the test surface must be sufficiently
continuous to accommodate the tester and traveling limits of the
apparatus.
5.4.2 When determining the SCOF of footwear soles and heels in
their "as found" condition, the test shall be preformed
per the following procedure.
5.4.2.1 Identify the footwear to be tested by manufacturer,
trade name, style, color, heel height etc. Record the temperature
and humidity.
5.4.2.2 Surface Preparation - Prior to starting the tests,
remove surface dirt from the footwear soling and test surfaces by
brushing with a paper towel. Be careful not to alter the test
surface during the process of removing the loose surface dirt. The
footwear is now ready for testing.
5.4.3 InSitu Actual Footwear
5.4.3.1 Place the heel or sole of the actual footwear on either
the polypropylene (dry test) or Secondary standard Florida Ceramic
Tile test panels (dry and wet test). Place a 4.54 kg (10 lb.)
weight (Model 80 Test Block) alternately on the heel or sole
making sure that the remainder of the soling material is not
resting on any surface.
5.4.3.2 Tape a string loop to the back of the heel and sides of
the shoe upper surface. Use a force gauge to determine the shear
force on both the dry and wet surfaces.
5.4.3.3 Weigh the footwear within 5.7 gm (0.2 oz.). (Postal
scale or equivalent)
5.5 Calibration
5.5.1 For the manually operated device, determine the force gage
correction factor at 0.50 SCOF by using a standard calibration
weight that is one-half the weight of the sled apparatus (vertical
force). Lift the standard test weight slowly vertically using the
force gage provided with the sled apparatus (Fig. 1). The gage
correction factor is determined by dividing the weight of the
standard weight by the force gage reading. For power actuated
devices and other types of manually operated devices, follow the
manufacturer's suggested calibration procedures.
5.5.2 Allow the temperature/humidity gage to stabilize before
testing.
5.5.3 Prepare the sensor pads per 5.6.1.
5.5.4 Prior to performing an on-site test, the performance of the
test instrument and the operator should be verified against a
secondary standard polypropylene test panel when initially received.
The average of the eight successive readings taken per 5.6.2 shall
be within 0.02 of the value stated in the manufacturer's log. The
range of readings should be within 0.05. The manufacturer of the
apparatus shown in Fig. 1 can provide "Certificates of Operator
Qualification"(Appendix Ref. 8).
5.6 Procedure - Dry for Determining Whether Footwear is Slip
Resistant
5.6.1 Test the proper functioning of the force gage. Verify the
instrument calibration per par. 5.5 or the manufacturer's
instructions. Dress the footwear sensor pads after affixing them to
the tester with the wear surface outside. Place the complete
assembly on a sheet of 400 grit wet/dry carborundum paper.9
Repeatedly pull the complete assembly in its normal direction of
travel across the carborundum paper until a uniform bearing surface
is achieved. This is accomplished by sanding the pads initially 30
times using a stroke about 102 mm (4 in.) long on 120 grit paper
followed by 15 strokes on 400 grit. Sand pads five times on 400 grit
wet /dry paper before each set of tests. Brush or wipe all foreign
material from the tester pads using a paper towel. Use same sanding
procedure for rubber type footwear materials except sand 25 times /
80 grit and 10 times / 400 grit.
5.6.2 Place the apparatus on the secondary standard polypropylene
test panel (primary criteria par. 3.1.6) with sufficient distance
for travel of the sled. Apply the load so as to minimize the
duration of contact with the Polypropylene Test Panel (2 sec. avg.).
Record the maximum horizontal axial force needed to initiate
movement. When movement is observed immediately stop the test.
Beginning with the normal walking direction, (A to C) repeat the
operation through two revolutions in 90 degree increments for a
total of eight readings by rotating the test panel. Minimize the
time the apparatus is in contact with the surface by pre-loading the
horizontally positioned force gage. Remove sensor pad pressure when
not testing.
5.7 Procedure- Dry & Wet Testing of Footwear
5.7.1 This procedure is performed only after determining whether
the footwear is "slip resistant" i.e. 0.50 minimum SCOF
when tested per 5.6 or 5.4.3 and correcting average SCOF per 5.8.
(ref 3.1.6)
5.7.2 Place tester on Secondary Standard Florida Ceramic Tile and
repeat 5.6.
5.7.3 Spray test surface with distilled water and repeat 5.6.2.
Place and slide pads on wet surface before testing.
5.7.4 Multiply the average SCOF by the gage correction factor.
Corrected average SCOF must be 0.60 minimum both dry and wet in
order to meet Ceramic Tile Institute of America requirements for
ceramic tile and similar materials (Ref 2.4) When using a Neolite
sensor. Footwear materials must meet 3.1.7 SCOF requirements.
5.7.5 Measure kinetic COF (KCOF) simultaneously with SCOF test
for 0.30 minimum requirement (Ref. 3.1.7) with sensors sliding on
wet (Ref. 5.7.2) Florida Ceramic Tile at an approximately constant
velocity of 5 cm/sec (2"sec).
5.8 Calculations
5.8.1 Divide the force gage scale reading (kg or lbs.) by the
weight of the assembly that is in contact with the surface. (On some
devices the scale is calibrated directly in SCOF3) Add weight of
shoe (5.4.3.3) to 4.54-kg (10-lb.) weight when testing actual
footwear.
5.8.2 For each of the readings taken, estimate the SCOF to the
nearest 0.01. Determine the average SCOF. Discard the initial
reading if greater than all other readings and then repeat it (See NOTE
5). Example: Average horizontal axial force to start motion = 2.72
Kg (6.0 lbs.).
| Test
weight = 4.54 Kg (10.0 lb.) |
SCOF = |
2.72 kg
---------
4.54 kg |
= |
6.0 lb
-------
10.0 lb |
= |
0.60 |
5.8.3 Correct the average SCOF value by multiplying it by
the force gage correction factor.
5.8.3.1 Sample Calculation
a) Average SCOF = 0.60
b) Force Gage Correction Factor
2.27 kg
---------
2.22 kg |
= |
(5.0 lb)
-------
(4.9 lb) |
= |
1.02 |
c) Corrected SCOF = (0.60)(1.02) = 0.64
d)
Footwear Traction Index
leather (dry), rubber (dry and wet) |
= |
Actual SCOF
------------------------------
SCOF marked on test panels |
5.9 Report
5.9.1 The report shall include the following:
5.9.1.1 A description of the type of footwear tested.
(Par 5.4.2.1)
5.9.1.2 The temperature and humidity of the
surrounding air during the test.
5.9.1.3 The type of instrument used for SCOF
measurements.
5.9.1.4 Report both the uncorrected and the corrected
SCOF arithmetic averages and the plus/minus variations of the eight
readings.
5.9.1.5 Rather than plus/minus variations, the
standard deviation for the average SCOF may be reported.
NOTE 5 - The approximate standard deviation for an
individual test result can be calculated from eight readings by
multiplying the range by 0.351. The range is the difference between the
maximum and minimum values within a group of readings.
5.9.1.6 State whether the smooth footwear sole and
heel materials are slip-resistant based on the Primary Criteria of the
SCOF equal to or greater than the Secondary Standard Polypropylene
Test Pan
5.9.1.7 Report the average SCOF and plus/minus
variations of the eight readings for dry and wet tests on the Florida
Ceramic Tile of smooth footwear materials.
5.9.1.8 State whether the dry and wet footwear sole
and heel materials are slip-resistant based on a minimum 0.50 dry
SCOF, 0.35 wet SCOF and 0.30 wet DCOF.
5.9.1.9 State whether actual (patterned) footwear
soles and heels are slip resistant. (Ref 5.9.1.6 - 5.9.1.8)
5.9.1.10 State the average Shore A hardness of the
heel and sole materials. (maximum 93 Shore A)
5.10 Precision and Bias (Appendix Ref. 10).
5.10.1 Table 1 is based on a round robin conducted in
l994 where six laboratories evaluated three test surfaces (one was a
polypropylene surface, see NOTE 7) using two drag type SCOF
testers. All laboratories tested the identical surfaces and leather
sensor. Leather sensors for the drag type testers were cut from the same
3" square leather sensor used on the articulated strut type
testers. While the round robin was not conducted in accordance with
Practice E691, the results are presented in accordance with its
guidelines. Within lab standard deviations of each test result were
estimated from range data {s(x) = R/d2 (n) }. Although each lab only
reported one test result per material ( with n = 8, per this
specification/test method), standard deviation of the means were
estimated by dividing the standard deviation of a test result by ( 8
1/2). Table 1 shows the corrected SCOF averages for all three labs,
surfaces, and testers (Appendix Ref. 3,4)
NOTE 6 - Caution - The following explanations of r and
R (par. 5.l0.2 thru 5.10.2.3) are only intended to present a meaningful
way of considering approximate precision of this test method. The
data in Table 1 should not be rigorously applied to acceptance or
rejection of material, as those data are specific to the round robin and
may not be representative of other lots, conditions, materials, or
laboratories. Users of this test method should apply the principles
outlined in ASTM Practice E691-87 to generate data specific to their
laboratory and materials, or between specific laboratories. The principles
of par. 5.10.2 thru 5.10.2.3 would then be valid for such data.
NOTE 7 Caution - Although the test method within this
specification allows testing of footwear materials both in the lab and on
site (Par. 5.1.1), the round robin summarized in Table 1 was based upon
laboratory measurements. The precision of the method based solely on SCOF
measurements taken on site (rather than "within lab" situations)
may be quite different.
5.10.2 Concept of r and R - If Sr and SR have
been calculated from a large enough body of data, and for at least two
test results from each lab from testing four directions per surface:
5.10.2.1 Repeatability Limit, r, (Comparing two
test results from the same material, obtained by the same operator
using the same equipment on the same day) - The two test results
should be judged not equivalent if they differ by more than the "
r " value for that material.
5.10.2.2 Reproducibility Limit, R, (Comparing
two test results from the same material, obtained by different
operators using different equipment in different laboratories) - The
two test results should be judged not equivalent if they differ by
more than the "R" value for that material.
5.10.2.3 Any judgment in accordance with par. 5.10.2.1
or 5.10.2.2 would have an approximate 95% (0.95) probability of being
correct.
|
Table 1
|
|
"SCOF" Precision Data
(leather sensor)
|
|
(values are unit-less)
|
|
|
Average "SCOF"
|
|
|
(Corrected)
|
Sr
|
SR
|
r
|
R
|
|
#78 Polypropylene
|
0.31
|
0.011
|
--
|
0.031
|
--
|
|
#1 OVCT (ASTM D2047)
|
0.45
|
0.023
|
--
|
0.065
|
--
|
|
#2 "Florida" Tile (ASTM Cl028)
|
0.42
|
0.020
|
--
|
0.057
|
--
|
A. Sr is the within-laboratory standard deviation
for the indicated material. It is obtained by averaging the standard
deviations of the test results from all of the laboratories:
Sr == [ (s1) + (s2) ...... + (sn) /n]
B. SR is the between-laboratories
reproducibility, expressed as standard deviation for the indicated
material. For this case:
SR = ( SL + Si /8)
C. r is the within-laboratory Repeatability Limit
= 2.83xSr
D. R is the between-laboratories Reproducibility
Limit = 2.83xSR
NOTE 8 - The corrected SCOF values of the #78
polypropylene material ("marked" value per par. 5.3.3.5) are
constant because it is the standard test surface. Therefore, if SR and R
values could be calculated for this material in Table 1 it would have to be
from uncorrected data.
NOTE 9 - SR and R could not be calculated for this round
robin study because the eight individual SCOF values per lab/material were
not reported. Only the range and average SCOF was reported.
5.10.3 Bias - There is no Bias for this test
method for measuring SCOF because the value of the SCOF is defined only
in terms of this test method.
6. CERTIFICATION AND INSPECTION
6.1 Certification and inspection of footwear evaluated per
this specification shall conform to the requirements specified herein.
7. KEYWORDS
7.1 Horizontal pull slip meter, static coefficient of
friction (SCOF), dynamic coefficient of friction (DCOF), Primary Standard
Polypropylene (leather) Test Surface, Secondary Standard Polypropylene
(leather) test surface, "Standardized Leather", Neolite, Slip
Resistance, Slip Resistant Walkway, Slip Resistant Footwear, Primary
Standard Florida Ceramic Tile, Secondary Standard Florida Ceramic Tile,
Leather Footwear Traction Index (dry), Rubber Footwear Traction Index (dry
and wet).
APPENDIX REFERENCES
1. This test method is under the jurisdiction of Voices of
Safety International (VOSI) and is the direct responsibility of subcommittee
of V41.20 on "Pedestrian Slip Resistance Requirements for Walkways and
Footwear". Copies are available from: Voices of Safety International;
264 Park Ave. North Caldwell, NJ 07006. Ph (973) 228-2258, fax (973)
228-0276.
2. Available from NPODS, Standardization Documents Order
Desk, Bldg. 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.
3. A suitable manually-operated device is the Technical
Products Co. Model 80 Floor & Footwear Friction Tester available from
Technical Products Co., 264 Park Ave., North Caldwell, NJ 07006, Ph (973)
228-2258.
4. A suitable power actuated device is the Whitely Model HPS
111 Slip Master, available from Whitely Industries, Inc., 939C East Street,
Tewksbury, MA 01876, 508/640-1177.
5. Available from footwear manufacturers
6. Resinol Type O, available from Allied Resinous Products,
Inc. Clark St. and Whitney Rd., P.O. Box 620, Conneaut, OH 44030, has been
found satisfactory for this purpose. "Resinol" is a registered
trademark for Allied Resinous Products, Inc.
7. CM #4693 Plastic Adhesive from 3M Co., St. Paul MN, has
been found satisfactory for this purpose.
8. Available from Technical Products Co., North Caldwell, NJ
07006, Ph (973) 228-2258.
9. Available from 3M Co., St. Paul, MN or most hardware
stores.
10. Supporting data are available from Voices of Safety
International. Reference Study 39, 8/11/97, Validation of V41.21 &
V41.22 (formally ASTM 5X and 5Y).
11. "Neolite"- Registered Trademark with Goodyear
Tire and Rubber Co. Available from Goodyear Shoe Products Div., 24 Hampshire
Dr., Hudson, NH 03051, (603)/598-4400. Standard Neolite soling for shoe
repairing. Specific gravity 1.45, Shore A Hardness 90-92.
12. Meserlian, Donald C., "Effects of Walking Cadence
on SCOF Required by the Elderly" pg. 29 "Proposed Uniform
Definitions", Professional Safety, November 1995 pgs 24-29. Study 21:
4/21/96
13. Ceramic Tile Institute of America, 12061 Jefferson
Blvd., Culver City, CA. (310) 574-7800
14. Meserlian, Donald C. " Static and Dynamic COF of
Neolite (Dry and wet) on unpainted and painted steel beams and decks
."; Jul. 19, 1996. Report to Steve Cooper, Executive Director,
Ironworker's International Union, Washington, D.C.
15. George, Michael "Slip Resistant footwear: Improving
Woman's Top Pieces": SATRA Bulletin, March 1989, pp. 161-162. (Artech
Footwear Testing Lab, Chantilly, Va.; 0.30 min DCOF using Stanley Pendulum
Tester).
16. Tile Council of America, P.O. Box 1787, Clemson, S.C.
864/646-8453. 1995 Standard Tile 8" x 8" Florida Tile "Vento"
- 8425 Mexican Sand.
17. "Monarch EVA" - Item F-01791, 12 Iron A.E.
Thermo Sole ruffed one side. Shore A Hardness 91 +/- 4. Monarch Rubber Co.,
3500 Pulaski Hwy., Baltimore, Md. 21224-1592 (410) 342-8510.
|